Skip to main content

New Laws for 2014: Retail Workers' Bill of Rights (San Francisco)


California certainly is on a roll, no?  First San Francisco and Oakland voters approve an increase in minimum wage in both cities over the coming years.  Now, we have the Retail Workers' Bill of Rights which is a comprehensive set of policies introduced as two different pieces of legislation.  

The Board of Supervisors in San Francisco has tentatively (and note, unanimously) passed both pieces of proposed legislation this week.  At this point, a confirmation vote is scheduled to occur today, November 25, and if the legislation passes, it will become law within 180 days after the effective date. 

It is important to highlight key pieces of both pieces of legislation, ahead of the confirmation vote.  


Board of Supervisors File No. 140880:  Hours and Retention Protections for Formula Retail Employees:
  • Applies to Formula Retail employers with 20 or more employees in San Francisco (Formula Retail are businesses with at least 20 retail sales establishments worldwide).
  • These employers would have to offer additional hours of work to current part-time employees before hiring new employees or using subcontractors; and
  • Retain employees for 90 days upon sale or other transfer of a retail establishment subjection to the ordinance and then make a written offer of employment to individuals on a retention list under the same terms of employment with respect to job classification, compensation, and number of hours worked


Board of Supervisors File No. 141024:  Fair Scheduling and Treatment of Formula Retail Employees:
  •  Under this piece of legislation, Formula Retail employers would have to provide their employees in San Francisco with:
  1. An initial estimate of the employee's expected minimum number of scheduled shifts per month and the days and hours of those shifts, prior to the start of employment; 
  2. Two weeks' advance notice of work schedules;
  3. Advance notice of any changes to the employee's bi-weekly schedule;
  4. Additional compensation for each schedule change the employer makes on less than seven days' notice; and
  5. Between two and four hours of pay, depending on the duration of the shift, for each on-call shift for which the employee is required to be available but is not actually called into work.

Additional information can be found here:  http://retailworkerrights.com/get-the-facts/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more