Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Work Closed Because of Storm - How Time Off & Paying Employees Works

This article goes through what employers and employees can expect to experience when an office closes because of weather and a question arises over whether the employees are entitled to be paid.  With winter storms sweeping across much of the country the past few weeks, including down south where it is not as common to experience work closures because of winter weather, this article provides a timely refresher.


Probationary Period For California Employees - How the ACA Comes Into Play

Nancy Yaffe makes note of how California employers are impacted by the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), in regard to when employees now have to be provided healthcare benefits. While many probationary periods are ninety days, the ACA no longer permits employers to wait that full time period before offering healthcare benefits.  Under the ACA, California employers have to provide healthcare benefits to their employees within sixty days of hiring the employee.

As a result, there is now an accelerated period in which employers in California need to determine whether the employee is a good fit.  It is important for employers to note that terminating someone with healthcare benefits is often more costly and administratively burdensome than terminating someone without them.


Pregnancy - Grounds for FMLA Time Off?

Many employers will face a time where an employee becomes pregnant and has difficulty performing the usual job responsibilities as a result of the pregnancy.  The question then becomes, is FMLA leave proper for a pregnancy?  The answer is most likely yes.  This article discusses a recent case in which the court ultimately held that FMLA leave was proper, even though the employee was healthy, when a pregnancy limited what she could do on the job.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...