Skip to main content

Ninth Circuit Holds President Biden Had Authority to Terminate NLRB’s General Counsel


Last Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that President Biden had the authority to remove the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), despite claims to the contrary. 

Readers will likely recall that when President Biden came into office back in January 2021, he took swift steps to remove the NLRB’s general counsel (Peter Robb) on his first day in the Oval Office and insert his own general counsel (Jennifer Abruzzo) who was later confirmed by the Senate in July of 2021.  Critics of the move immediately called President Biden’s move unlawful and without any legal authority, not to mention the fact this was the first time a president and removed the NLRB’s general counsel.

Unsurprisingly, lawsuits began over the matter in both the Fifth and Ninth Circuits on the grounds that the termination was unlawful and any subsequent rulings from the NLRB were invalid.  Last April, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that President Biden lawfully terminated the NLRB’s’s general counsel (and therefore any subsequent rulings from the NLRB’s were valid.)  

As noted above, last Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals followed suit and issued a similar ruling.  In its ruling, the Ninth Circuit held that the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) allowed the removal of board members “for neglect of south or malfeasance in office.”  Notably, a board member cannot  be removed simply because a president desires it.  However, the NLRA does not provide similar protections for the NLRB’s general counsel.  As a result, the Ninth Circuit held the President Biden could lawfully remove President Trump appointed Peter Robb, and therefore any subsequent  rulings from the NLRB were valid.


For additional information:  https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/01/27/22-70002.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more