Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


As we hit mid month, I wanted to stop and catch my breath and highlight a couple of good articles this week.  The first is for those HR fans (especially those that work for smaller employers) in which a writer at Business Insider notes a few ways smaller employers are recruiting and retaining employees in the midst of a tight labor market.  The second article delves into a recent labor union movement among graduate students at Yale.  Even for those that are not drawn to labor law news, this article is worth a quick read.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Smaller Employers Get Creative On Ways To Attract (& Retain) Employees

Alexandra York at Business Insider wrote an article recently in which she noted a growing trend among some smaller employers to find innovative ways to attract and retain employees.  It should come as no surprise that many industries have an extremely tight labor market now and often, large employers are able to attract and retain the best of the best among the available labor pool.  However, some smaller employers have found that being flexible with scheduling, hours, work from home arrangements, and related employee benefits has helped them stand out from large employers.  Will large employers eventually find a way to circumvent the benefits being offered by smaller employers?  Likely.  However, for the time being, as the article notes, smaller employers appear to have the upper hand.


Yale Grad Students Successfully Form Union

On Monday, it was announced that following an in person and mail in election late last year, graduate and professional students had voted to form a union.  Notably, of the 2,039 votes cast, 1,860 voted in favor of unionization with only 179 votes against.  The next step will be for negotiations to begin over a collective bargaining agreement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per