Skip to main content

Not So Fast My Friend: California’s FAST Recovery Act Meets Resistance


Readers might recall that earlier this year, California had passed the FAST Recovery Act which would create a fast food council that would be able to set wage rates and working conditions in the fast food industry.  

That legislation, AB 257, was met with considerable pushback before being signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 5th.  Employers and related business groups opposed the legislation on the grounds that the council, comprised of unelected officials, would be able to set the wage rate for fast food workers to $22/hour by 2023 and impose further wage hikes at their discretion.

Although AB 257 was signed into law, opposition continued to mount with Save Local Restaurants being formed to find ways to stop AB 257 from taking effect.  In doing so, that required this group to submit 623,212 signatures to the California Secretary of State to get a ballot measure on the 2024 ballot.  The goal of this group is to get voters to repeal the FAST Recovery Act.  

According to reports, the Save Local Restaurants group submitted more than 1 million signatures to the Secretary of State in an effort to get the measure on the 2024 ballot.  While that is not certain to happen, submitting more than the required number of signatures gives the group some breathing room if the Secretary of State throws out some signatures upon review.

For the time being, this is a developing story to keep a close eye on while we await confirmation from the Secretary of State that the minimum number of signatures have been submitted and accepted.


For additional information:  https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/restaurant-groups-push-overturn-california-fast-food-wage-law

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more