Skip to main content

Unionization Efforts Gaining Foothold at Starbucks, Amazon, REI, Etc. - What Gives?


For those that have been paying attention over the past few months, unionization efforts have been taking off at various companies across the country.  Not to be glib for those readers that are strong supporters of labor unions, but workers seeking to unionize is nothing new.

However, what makes some of these recent unionization efforts at Starbucks, Amazon, and REI, among others, especially noteworthy is the fact that there are tangible achievements being made to create the first unions at these companies.  Take Starbucks, for instance.  Prior to elections at three stores in Buffalo a few months ago, Starbucks had repeatedly been able to keep unions out of its company owned locations.  However, workers at two of the three Buffalo locations voted to unionize.  What happened afterward?  Workers at dozens (and dozens) of locations elsewhere around the company announced they were taking steps to unionize as well.  In fact, a location in Mesa, Arizona recently became another store in which workers voted overwhelmingly to unionize.  This, of course, has led workers at other locations to announce that they too will seek to form a union.  That has led many watching this story develop come to the conclusion that all it took was the successful unionization of those two locations in Buffalo for workers to see that unionization at Starbucks was possible.

Consider as well the second election currently underway at an Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama.  Readers will likely recall that while the first mail in election resulted in a large number of workers voting against unionization, those results were thrown out and a second election was ordered.  While I am not going to make a prediction that these workers will swing the opposite way and vote to unionize this time, I think that a closer election will give workers at other Amazon warehouses the “courage” (or maybe I should say inspiration) to attempt to unionize as well.  If, however, the workers at the Bessemer location actually voted to unionize…oh boy.  That would set a chain reaction in motion almost immediately in which I would expect to see press releases, rallies, and related events at other warehouses with Amazon workers loudly voicing their intent to unionize.

Finally, consider the approval of workers at an REI location in SoHo, New York to unionize.  A vote on March 2nd saw 88 workers vote for unionization with only 14 voting against it.  In doing so, this becomes the first unionized REI in the country.  Unlike workers at Starbucks, I have not seen much in the way of rumblings of other REI locations unionizing following the March 2nd vote.  However, it would not surprise me if workers at other REI locations saw that despite the company fighting against unionization, it is possible to successfully unionize at the company.

As noted, the key thing for a lot of success with these unionization efforts has been momentum.  Starbucks workers certainly have it.  REI workers have it following the March 2nd vote in SoHo.  Amazon workers might even have it too, depending upon the vote in Alabama.  For those watching, the past few months have been packed to the gills with positive union developments for organized labor.  The question remains, how long will this momentum last?


For additional information:  https://gothamist.com/news/rei-workers-in-soho-voted-to-form-companys-first-union-organizers-say

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more