Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Perhaps this should have been a “Labor Law Edition” to close out the week, given that the two articles that I want to highlight for readers are labor centric.  Even for those readers that do not encounter labor unions or unionization efforts often, I encourage you to give both of the below articles a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Starbucks & the Union Elections: The Start of a Wave Of Unionization Efforts In the Food Industry?

As readers might recall, workers at several Buffalo area Starbucks locations have sought to unionize.  While Starbucks has sought to have one election for all the stores, each store will have its own election.  As Katishi Maake at Retail Brew writes, labor advocates are hoping to use a successful election at one (or more) of the Buffalo area stores as a catalyst to encourage other workers in the food industry to follow suit.  I refer readers to the article for Maake’s thoughts on the matter.  While the results of the elections will still not be known for a few more weeks, a loss (even a close one) might not quell the desire of other food service workers to attempt a similar election.


Unions Seek to Allow Connecticut National Guard to Unionize

For those unfamiliar with the matter, a 1978 law forbids members of the armed forces from unionizing.  That begs the question (for some) as to whether members of the National Guard can lawfully unionize.  It turns out, that might be decided by a judge, following several unions filing suit seeking to have the 1978 law being declared inapplicable as to members of the National Guard which would consequently allow members of the Connecticut National Guard to vote to unionize.  This could turn into an interesting case to follow.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more