Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Block Vaccine Mandate For New York City School Employees

 

Late this afternoon, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied a request by New York City school employees that sought an injunction against a vaccine mandate in the workplace.

Readers might recall a note I posted earlier this week about how some New York City school employees were trying to contest the requirement that they get the coronavirus vaccine or risk being terminated.  The request that the Supreme Court issue an injunction was a last gasp effort to stop the vaccine policy from taking effect.  Justice Sotomayor, who handles emergency requests from New York, did not refer the matter to the entire Supreme Court.  (This is standard as each Supreme Court Justice handles emergency requests from particular parts of the country.  In this case, Justice Sotomayor hears matters out of New York.  It is at the discretion of each Justice to either decline a particular emergency request or to refer it to the entire Court.)  Therefore, it is possible that had the entire Supreme Court heard the matter, an injunction could have been issued (which is what the New York City school employees sought.)  Even with the denial of this request for an injunction, it is possible that the matter will still eventually wind up before the entire Supreme Court.

For the time being, based upon today’s denial by Justice Sotomayor, New York City school employees that refuse to get the coronavirus vaccine risk being terminated.


For additional information:  https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/10/01/politics/new-york-vaccine-school-sotomayor/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

For a copy of the Emergency Application to the Supreme Court:  https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A50/194220/20210930135258574_Maniscalco%20v%20NYC%20Dept%20of%20Education%20-%20Emergency%20Application.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more