Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

While this is not necessarily a minimum wage dedicated post, I think it certainly trends in that direction given the two articles I am highlighting this week.  For starters, a recent development at Target in regard to the entire compensation package offered to employees is noteworthy.  When taking into account a proposal to eliminate the minimum wage rate in California (proposed by a candidate in the recall election for Governor), there is a lot for readers to chew on here.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Target Offers to Pay 100% of College Tuition In Effort to Attract Workers

As CNBC reported earlier this week, Target is offering to pay 100% of college tuition for its workers (in approximately 250 degree programs) as the big box retailer competes with other employers to attract workers.  While other companies such as Chipotle, WalMart, and Chipotle have implemented similar college tuition offers to entice workers to come aboard, Target’s program is unique in so much that workers (at stores, distribution centers, and headquarters) would qualify on their first day on the job.  For those workers that do not choose to pursue one of the 250 degree programs Target has identified, Target will still pay up to $5,250 for non-master’s degrees and up to $10,000 for master’s degrees.  For those looking for a job (and interested in going to college), get your application into Target sooner rather than later.


Larry Elder, Candidate in California’s Recall Election, Calls for $0.00 Minimum Wage Rate

File this one under “sensationalist” headline...but maybe there is a bit more here once you dig in.  As readers might have heard, there is an upcoming recall election in California for Governor.  Many (and I do mean many) candidates are running to replace the current Governor, Gavin Newsom.  One candidate, Larry Elder, recently spoke out on the rising minimum wage rate in the state and suggested that the rate should actually be $0.00.  Yes, $0.00.  As The Sacramento Bee reported, Elder suggested that the current rate ($14/hour for employers with 26 or more employees and $13/hour for employers with fewer) stifles employers and imposes an unnecessary burden on them with rising labor costs.  Instead, Elder seems to believe that the free market would dictate wage rates, presumably with employers raising their wage rates to attract workers.  While that might be the case for some employers, I think it just as easy to envision a situation where employers in a given industry would intentionally suppress wages and keep pay at poverty levels (or below) since there would be no minimum wage rate.  Will Elder’s proposal work?  Maybe.  However, he first needs to win that recall election for this to be a realistic possibility.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per