Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (U.S. Congress)

 

As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Pregnancy discrimination is often a much discussed topic in employment circles given the confusion over whether, and how, employers are required to accommodate pregnant workers.  With the introduction of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) in Congress, that confusion may soon be coming to an end.

Under the proposed legislation, employment practices would be prohibited to the extent they discriminate against making reasonable accommodations for qualified employees affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.  (A “qualified employee” is defined as an employee or applicant who, with or without reasonable accommodations, can perform the essential functions of the position, with specified exceptions.

The PWFA would make it unlawful for employers to:  fail to make reasonable accommodations to known limitations of such employees unless the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on an entity’s business operation; require a qualified employee (as defined above) affected by such condition to accept an accommodation other than any reasonable accommodation arrived at through the interactive process; deny employment opportunities based upon the need of the entity to make such reasonable accommodations to a qualified employee; require such employees to take paid or unpaid leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided; or take  adverse action in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment against a qualified employee requesting or using such reasonable accommodations.

Currently, the House of Representatives Rules Committee will meet this afternoon to prepare the bill for a floor vote.  After that is done, I would expect the PWFA to move quickly to a vote, which is widely expected to be approved.  (A prior version of the PWFA passed the House by a vote of 329 - 17 in 2020.)  With Democrats also having majority control of the Senate (and a bipartisan bill making its way through that chamber), I would expect the PWFA to reach President Joe Biden’s desk for signature sooner rather than later.


For additional information:  https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1065

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more