Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: President Joe Biden Edition

 

Apologies to those expecting a post talking about more nuanced labor & employment law topics without a touch of politics.  With this week being the inauguration and the incoming administration already taking action with the termination of the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel Wednesday evening, there are a couple related topics that are highly relevant to close out the week.  While the last article is not necessarily “President Biden” specific, I wanted to highlight the article to provide readers a bit of food for thought.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Biden Administration’s Potential $15/Hour Minimum Wage Hike & the Ramifications

On the heels of Joe Biden getting sworn in on Wednesday, there are already talks over a potential federal minimum wage hike to $15/hour.  With Democrats controlling both the House and Senate, it is likely (if not probable) that we will see a minimum wage bill headed to President Biden’s desk sooner rather than later.  In anticipation of that, the Congressional Budget Office has released a report in which it speculates that approximately 3.7 million jobs would be lost if the federal minimum wage rate got raised to $15/hour.  Whether that figure is too conservative (or too liberal) is up for debate.  Should the federal minimum wage rate be increased during President Biden’s term, however, we might see whether this 3.7 million job loss forecast is on the money.


What A Paid Leave Policy Might Look Like Under a President Biden Administration

The New York Times made note earlier this week of a paid leave proposal being floated by the Biden administration.  Under the proposal, full and part time workers would be paid up to $1,400/week (to replace their wages) to take fourteen weeks (or more) of paid leave.  The grounds for using the paid leave would include:  an employee being sick with coronavirus symptoms, quarantine because of coronavirus exposure, needing time off to get a vaccine, caring for family members who are sick with coronavirus symptoms, caring for children whose school or day care center was closed because of the pandemic, and caring for older relatives or adult dependents whose long term care facilities were closed because of the pandemic.  As many readers are likely wondering, how would the paid leave be funded?  Employers with less than 500 employees would be reimbursed in the form of a payroll tax credit.  Larger employers would be required to cover the cost themselves.  Will this proposal make it across the finish line?  With the prior paid leave lapsing and Congress intent to do something, while this proposal might be a starting point, I think it is likely we will see something in the coming months.


Would You Give Up Your Vacation Time In Exchange For Remote Work?

According to a recent study, approximately 50% of those polled said they would give up their vacation time in exchange for being allowed to work remotely.  As we have seen over the past ten or so months, while allowing employees to work remotely might have been untenable at first, it has quickly become commonplace (and successful) for many.  That is not to say there will not continue to be hiccups for many that choose to work remotely.  However, with many employees still being given latitude to determine when they feel comfortable returning to the workplace (kudos to those employers that remain flexible...while I refrain from too harshly chastising those employers that demand employees return to the workplace), perhaps a trade off of (some) vacation time for remote work is not out of the question.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...