Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: S4204 (New Jersey Legislature)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


A few weeks ago, a bill was introduced in the New Jersey Legislature which would codify a new standard to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee.  

Readers will recall that earlier this year, California codified its ABC test...much to the chagrin of gig companies that operate in the state. Now, like California's AB 5 which codified the ABC test, New Jersey's proposed legislation, S4204, would codify the ABC test in the state but also go one step further.  The ABC test currently stipulates that a worker is considered an employee of the company unless:  A) The individual is free from control or direction over the performance of services; B) The service is either outside the usual course of the business for which it is performed, or the service is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which it is performed; and C) The individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business.  Readers should make note that the ABC Test places the burden on the company, rather than the worker.

However, S4204 would amend prong "B" in so much that a company would only be able to satisfy this prong by showing that the work performed by the individual is outside the company's usual core business. Of note, S4204 would make it more difficult for companies in New Jersey to classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.  As well, prong "C" would be amended in so much that an individual must provide the company with the same type of services he/she provides in that profession or trade.

With Democrats in control of the New Jersey Legislature (and with a Democratic Governor in place), S4204 might have the legs to make it through and become law.  Stay tuned.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more