Skip to main content

Breaking: Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta Resigns


Stop the presses!  This morning, President Donald Trump announced that Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta was resigning and would formally step down next week.  The announcement was made on the White House South Lawn this morning in which both President Trump and Secretary Acosta appeared.  Secretary Acosta was the first Labor Secretary under President Trump and had served in the role since 2017.

Readers might be wondering why Secretary Acosta is resigning after a relatively smooth past few years at the Department of Labor.  For those unaware, Secretary Acosta had been a bit embattled in recent months over a 2008 plea deal he negotiated with Jeffrey Epstein while Acosta served as a US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida.  The plea deal was a non-prosecutorial agreement whereby the federal government agreed to halt a federal sex abuse investigation against Epstein in return for Epstein pleading guilty to a lesser offense.  That plea deal was criticized by many as being overly lenient and enabled Epstein to avoid a potentially more severe punishment.  

Following Epstein’s recent arrest, increased attention was put on that 2008 plea deal with many Democrats calling for Secretary Acosta’s resignation.  Secretary Acosta recently held a press conference in which he defended his actions and appeared to assuage concerns in the White Hoise about the criticism.  However, it appears that press conference did not resolve the matter, given the unexpected resignation announcement this morning.

It is worth noting that President Trump indicated the resignation was voluntarily given and praised Secretary Acosta for his work at the Department of Labor.  At this point, it is too early to predict who will be nominated to fill the vacant Labor Secretary position.  I would keep an eye on this over the coming weeks as a new nominee will likely be put forth shortly.


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1029226

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...