Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I found myself short on time this week with several work trips, but I did manage to come across a few good updates (in regard to right to work and minimum wage).  In particular, I call attention to a Court of Appeals decision from earlier this week.  That case is one to keep an eye on going forward.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at the Unique Nature of the Upcoming Rught to Work Vote in Missouri

As I have covered over the past few months, this August, voters in Missouri will have an opportunity to cast their vote in regard to whether the Missouri Legislature’s passage of a statewide tight to work law will remain in place.   Brian Hausworth at Missourinet notes that this upcoming vote is on an actual referendum, something that has not occurred in the state in more than 35 years.  Hausworth does a good job summarizing the right to work fight up until this point, and notes the poor performance of referendums in the state’s history.  (Apparently only two referendums have ever been approved in Missouri).  Well worth a quick read ahead of the August 7th vote.


11th Circuit Issues Major Decision in Minimum Wage Case Out of Alabama

On Wednesday, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in a minimum wage case that has started to garner national attention.  That lawsuit involved several claims, but the claim that was reinstated by the Court of Appeals centered on an allegation that the Alabama Legislature improperly nullified a Birmingham City Council minimum wage hike for workers in predominantly black Birmingham, Alabama.  The lawsuit alleged that this pre-emption action violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.  While the Court’s opinion is somewhat lengthy, it is worth a review.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more