Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


ERISA issues are always very interesting to read about, given the often complex nature of the disputes.  Recently, the United States Supreme Court ruled on two ERISA issues that I wanted to highlight for readers.  The Bloomberg article breaks down the cases relatively well and includes links to the actual opinions...for those readers looking for a little "light" reading.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


United States Supreme Court Addressed Two ERISA Issues Recently

For those interested in ERISA issues, Bloomberg had a good note on the United States Supreme Court's action on two recent cases on the matter.  One case, Montanile v. Bd. of Trs. of Nat'l Elevator Indus. Health Benefit Plan, resulted in a ruling that an employee benefit plan cannot assert a lien on a participant's settlement proceeds if the participant has already spent the amounts in question.  The second case, Amgen Inc. v. Harris, resulted in a short, unsigned ruling which held that workers who challenge losses in their employer stock plans face a higher hurdle than lower courts have applied previously.  For those interested in ERISA issues, these are two big cases to review.



The Columbus Dispatch published an article recently on the GOP attempt to overhaul Ohio's unemployment compensation system.  Critics of House Bill 394 have argued that the legislation would reduce benefits to jobless workers and entirely eliminate them for others.  Interestingly, one of the provisions of the legislation would prohibit workers from receiving unemployment benefits if they were fired for violating the terms of an employee handbook.  (That could potentially exclude a lot of people...).  It will be interesting to watch this one proceed through the Ohio Legislature.



This article details a recent case filed by a former librarian at Washington University who alleged that she was subjected to age discrimination and ultimately was constructively discharged by her employer.  The librarian, who worked at the university for over 20 years, alleged that she began to experience hostility from the younger managers at the library.  She claimed that her duties were reduced and areas of responsibility were given to younger, less experienced library staff.  After her complaints to human resources went nowhere, she took a leave of absence and was eventually constructively discharged.  Very interesting facts in this case; I would be interested to read the University's response to the claims.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more