Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: HR Edition


Every so often, I post a "What I've Been Reading This Week" article that focuses on a particular topic.  It has been a while since I dedicated a post to strictly HR related issues, and given that I came across several good articles on the topic, I thought readers might enjoy an HR related post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Using Private E-mail for Work: A Lesson

This article from the HR Capitalist has a clever look at what employers and employees alike can learn from the issues surrounding Hillary Clinton's use of personal e-mail for work related matters.  The biggest takeaway that I think readers will find useful are the helpful "hints" on what employers and employees should consider before sending work related e-mails.  Well worth a read, if for nothing more than as a reminder to avoid potentially disastrous work related e-mails that could come back to bite you...



All too often, I see articles and cases that discuss employees (and some employers) who use social media for work related purposes...and often not for good reasons (such as posting derogatory comments about co-workers, leaking trade secrets online, etc.).  Hilliary Comeau has a different take on social media and work, namely a few instances when social media can be used in a positive way.  While I would suggest that employers and employees not use social media for any work related purpose in order to avoid potential issues altogether, this article has a few interesting exceptions that some might find useful.


Are You Downsizing? A Few Suggestions on How Employers Can Handle It

Marilyn Moran has a good note on what an employer can do when deciding to downsize.  In particular, she provides three well thought out suggestions on what employers can do to handle the actual downsizing.  While note every employer will handle downsizing and a reduction in force in the same way, these are a few suggestions that employers should review.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more