Skip to main content

Is An Employee Required to Work During FMLA Leave?


I came across a recent Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") case out of my hometown, Houston, a few days ago.  The case, Smith v. Genon Energy, highlighted a serious FMLA issue that I want to tie into a bigger article:  Is an employee required to work during FMLA leave?

By way of background, 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1) provides that it is "unlawful for any employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or the attempt to exercise, any right provided."  Note that "interfering with" includes "not only refusing to authorize FMLA leave, but discouraging an employee from using such leave." 

Now the court in which Smith v. Genon Energy was pending, the District Court for the Southern District of Texas, established that the Fifth Circuit had not previously considered whether requiring an employee to perform work while on FMLA leave amounted to interference.  As a result, it  became important to look at how courts in other circuits have interpreted the issue. 

Employers can breathe easy knowing that it is generally held that reasonable contact limited to inquires about the location of files or passing along institutional or status knowledge will not interfere with an employee's FMLA rights.  Perhaps most importantly, there is "no right in the FMLA to be left alone" or be completely relieved from responding to an employer's discrete inquiries.   (O'Donnell v. Passport Health Communications, Third Circuit).  For instance, a request for materials from an employee is not an impermissible demand for work during FMLA leave.  (Sabourin v. Univ. of Utah, Tenth Circuit).  Even an employee taking occasional calls about their job while on leave is a "professional courtesy" that does not interfere with the exercise of FMLA rights.  (Kesler v. Barris, Eastern District of Michigan). 

However, employers should recognize that asking an employee to perform work while on leave can constitute interference.  For instance, asking an employee to perform work related tasks while on medical leave has been held to interfere with an employee's FMLA rights.  (Arban v. West Publishing Corp., Sixth Circuit).  Asking an employee to respond to regular phone calls, come into work for several hours a day, or talking with the employer about sales lead an employee is expected to generate during FMLA leave is unlawful interference.  (Sherman v. AI/FOCS, Inc., District Court of Massachusetts). 

So the moral of the story:  If it looks and smells like work, it probably is!  De minimis contact with employees on FMLA leave likely does not interfere with FMLA rights.  An occasional phone call asking about a file or providing closure on completed assignments is probably allowed.  However, when an employer starts to require an employee do work related tasks while on FMLA leave, such as showing up to the office or working from home for a few hours per week, this likely amounts to unlawful interference with an employee's FMLA rights and exposes the employer to liability.  

Employers, be smart when considering whether to ask an employee to do a work related task while they are on FMLA leave.  FMLA liability issues abound.


Special thanks to FMLA Insights for getting a copy of the Smith v. Genon Energy opinion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more